Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Olsen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 6, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.

“Every policy of insurance issued or delivered within this state on or after the first day of January, nineteen hundred and eight, by any life insurance corporation doing business within the state shall contain the entire contract between the parties.” Laws 1907, c. 110, s. 1. Whether under this statute the parties could agree that another paper not incorporated in the policy should contain a part of the contract so that either could rely upon stipulations therein, and whether, if they could not, the attaching of a copy of such a paper to the policy makes the original a part of the policy…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Story v. Williamsburgh Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. PatersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1870
  3. Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. CummingsOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Baltimore Life Insurance v. FloydSupreme Court of Delaware · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Woodmen of the WorldMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Levas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wier v. Texas Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1948
  4. Globe Life Insurance Co. of Illinois v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API