Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Woodmen of the World

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1937No. 7,660PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant society is not a corporation selling insurance for profit. It is a mutual society whose members agreed to contribute to each other through a corporation formed with peculiar statutory limitations as to its powers and the protection which it furnished its members. The statute under which it was organized — Colorado — and the laws of the state where the certificate was delivered — Montana — become important. These states, for reasons of their own and a public policy thus expressed in the statute, limited the persons who could be made beneficiaries. The statutes of the two states…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Grigsby v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of MurnionMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Grady v. City of LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Jenson v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In Re the Marriage of GeertzMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Spradlin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API