Legal Opinion
City of Randleman v. Hudson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided September 18, 1968No. 6819SC259PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
In Goldston v. Chambers, 272 N.C. 53, 157 S.E. 2d 676, Chief Justice Parker stated:
“It, is within the power of the trial judge in the exercise of his sound discretion to set aside a jury verdict, in whole or in part. G.S. 1-207; ... A verdict is a solemn act of a jury, and it should not be set aside without mature consideration; but the power of the court to set aside a verdict as a matter of discretion- has always been inherent and is necessary to the proper administration of justice.”
He 'goes on to state:
“We have held repeatedly since 1820 in case after case, and no principle is more fully…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Settee v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Goldston v. ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michaels v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Branson v. YorkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971