Legal Opinion

Horgan v. Industrial Design Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1982No. 18104PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

On this appeal plaintiff Jack Horgan, a former employee of the defendant corporations, seeks reversal of the trial court’s adverse summary judgment in an action to recover losses stemming from the termination of plaintiff’s employment.

Plaintiff began employment as an engineer with defendant Abe W. Mathews Engineering Corporation (AWMECO), a Minnesota corporation, in October 1957. . In 1976 AWMECO acquired defendant Industrial Design Corporation (IDC), a Utah corporation. To assist in the supervision of this newly acquired subsidiary, the AWME-CO directors decided to transfer…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Urban Plumbing & Heating Co., an Oregon Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Retail Clerks Health & Welfare Trust Funds v. Shopland Supermarket, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Witt v. WatkinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bihlmaier v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ward v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Spradling v. BlackburnDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
  5. Gold Standard, Inc. v. Getty Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API