United States Casualty Co. v. Richardson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
In the brief and argument on rehearing it is earnestly urged on behalf of the employer that the court overlooked controlling decisions as authority which would require a different judgment from the one rendered. In dealing with division 1 of the opinion counsel for the employer insist that the court overlooked the case of Ætna Casualty &c. Co. v. Chandler, 61 Ga. App. 311 (6 S. E. 2d, 142). This is the only Georgia case cited by counsel on rehearing. We have read this case carefully. Under the facts of the Chandler case and the opinion therein, we find no conflict in the opinion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hall v. General Accident Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Tabuteau v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Burdick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.