Legal Opinion

Hoagland v. State ex rel. Schrieber

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1895No. 1,433PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom the Jennings Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

— The appellee sued appellant for having voluntarily permitted the escape of a defendant committed to his charge upon a final judgment in a bastardy prosecution.

The questions presented arise upon the exceptions to the conclusions of law on a special finding and a motion to modify the judgment.

Erom the facts found it appears that the appellee’s judgment was duly rendered, and the defendant duly committed to the .sheriff’s care, and imprisoned by him in the proper jail, on account of his failure to pay or replevy the judgment as required by law.

On three different occasions the sheriff…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. M'Elroy v. ManciusNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  3. Lansing v. FleetNew York Supreme Court · 1800
  4. State ex rel Billman v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Spader v. FrostIndiana Supreme Court · 1836

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mangana's Admx. v. FranzoniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  2. Mangan's Admx. v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API