Legal Opinion

Spader v. Frost

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1836PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Montgomery Circuit Court..

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

Debt by P. G. and J. Frost against Spader, Crane, and Ketcliam, on a bond for the penalty. The defendants craved oyer of the obligation and condition. The former is in the usual form, the latter as follows: “ The condition of the above obligation is this, that if the above-bound Spader, from and after the date of these presents, shall continue a true prisoner in the custody of the jailer or prison-keeper, and within the limits of the prison-bounds in the county and state aforesaid, without attempting any manner of escape, until discharged by law, then this obligation to be void, otherwise to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clap v. CofranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. Martin v. KennardIndiana Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Luke v. Calhoun CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Caffrey v. DudgeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Commonwealth v. EvaulPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1924
  5. Commonwealth v. GableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1821

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API