Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Hoyt
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSearl, J.
This proceeding is brought for mandamus (Civ. Prac. Act, art. 78) to compel the sole assessor of. the City of Watertown to permit petitioner to inspect and make copies of:
1. Kardex records covering some 9,000 parcels of real estate located within the city of Watertown from 1940 to date, the Kardex récords having been made by the respondent as well as his associate assessor, Sanford G. Humphrey, who retired on January 1st, 1950.
2. Inspection of written applications for assessment changes made before the board of review of the City of Watertown and the minutes and proceedings of the board of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ex Parte UppercuSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Egan v. Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Stenstrom v. HarnettNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- People ex rel. Stenstrom v. HarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- People ex rel. Woodill v. FosdickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cherkis v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In re SmithNew York City Family Court · 1970
- Drelich v. KahnNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Cline v. Board of Trustees of Schenectady County Community CollegeNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Szikszay v. BuelowNew York Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.