Legal Opinion
St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Minnesota ex rel. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 26, 1909No. 162PublishedCited by 9 opinions
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ¿THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. This case involved a question almost the same as that in Northern Pacific Railway v. Duluth in which it was held that a railway was not deprived of its property without due process of law by being obliged to rebuild a viaduct over streets of a city.
1Per curiam
Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern Pacific Railway Company v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Duluth, 208 U. S. 583.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bacon v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Minnesota Ex Rel. Village of Clara CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Contino v. Baltimore & Annapolis R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Prosser v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.