Legal Opinion

Webster v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1879PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chiep Justice

delivered the opinion of the court.

Barnett sued Blew and Webster in assumpsit upon a note for $500, executed by Blew, payable to the order of Webster, and, by him endorsed to Barnett. Due service was had upon both defendants, and default was entered as against . Blew for want of appearance and plea. Webster appeared and pleaded only that he did not have due notice of the dishonor or non-payment of the note, upon which issue was joined and the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff and assessed the damages at $523.33. The term closed 29th June, 1878.

At the succeeding term…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Executors of Livingston v. TremperNew York Supreme Court · 1814

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Williams v. Peninsular Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. McCallum v. DriggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  3. Hainlin v. BudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Stillman v. MerrittSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Somers v. Florida Pebble Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API