Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 29, 2001No. 3290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURETON, Judge.

In this criminal action, Timothy Kirby and Sally C. Parker appeal from their grand larceny convictions on the ground *253that the trial court lacked the requisite subject matter jurisdiction.1 We agree and vacate the convictions.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Marlboro County grand jury indicted Kirby and Parker on a single count of armed robbery for perpetrating a sham robbery of Boulevard Express, a local convenience store, on November 2, 1997. The crime netted the pair $1,192.00 in currency and two pistols. Kirby was also indicted for contributing to the delinquency of a minor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. GunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API