State v. Parker
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision that grand larceny is not a lesser-included offense of armed robbery. We affirm in result.
FACTS
Respondents were indicted for armed robbery for perpetrating a sham armed robbery of a convenience store where respondent Sally Parker worked. At the close of the State’s case at trial, respondents moved for a directed verdict on the armed robbery charge. The trial court granted the motion on the armed robbery charge, but stated he would charge the jury on the lesser-included offense of grand larceny. No *569objection was made.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. Al-AminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Hudgins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.