Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 2002No. 25538PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision that grand larceny is not a lesser-included offense of armed robbery. We affirm in result.

FACTS

Respondents were indicted for armed robbery for perpetrating a sham armed robbery of a convenience store where respondent Sally Parker worked. At the close of the State’s case at trial, respondents moved for a directed verdict on the armed robbery charge. The trial court granted the motion on the armed robbery charge, but stated he would charge the jury on the lesser-included offense of grand larceny. No *569objection was made.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Al-AminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Hudgins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API