Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Hudson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Case by Ella Campbell against Lester S. Hudson for malicious prosecution. From an order overruling a demurrer to a plea in abatement, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

This cause comes here upon a writ of error from a judgment of the circuit court for the county of Eaton, overruling a demurrer to a plea in abatement. The plea alleges, in substance, that defendant, a resident of Ingham county, was decoyed into Eaton county at the instigation of the plaintiff for the purpose of' obtaining service upon him of a copy of the declaration. After the allegations of residence in Ingham county at the time of the service and hitherto, and negativing residence in Eaton county, the plea avers that—

*524“Said defendant was decoyed into- said county of Eaton, and, as said…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kenney v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Townsend v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Hurlburt v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Chubbuck v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Metcalf v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1864

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. O. Painter Fertilizer Co. v. DuPontSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Genack v. GormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. De Velin v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Wanner v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API