Legal Opinion

Ogg v. Gunderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1946No. Civ. 15167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The primary contention presented by appellant is that the evidence does not support the finding that the grantor executed and delivered to the grantee the deed whereby the latter became vested with title to the property described in the conveyance.

The testimony of Attorney Richard J. Keller and of defendant Nehls establishes that for some years prior to July, 1943, Attorney Ogg acted as counsellor for decedent Katerina Czech. In that month she moved into the orbit of the influence of Nehls, her business agent, and for a time thereafter relied upon him for guidance. On July 24 she requested…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Stewart v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Tunison v. ChamblinIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Fisher v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Barr v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,998, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4447, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7202 in Re Theodore Steven Roosevelt, Debtor. Finalco, Inc. v. Theodore Steven RooseveltCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Hennelly v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Camperi v. ChiechiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Mecchi v. PicchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API