Legal Opinion
Aluminum Line Products Co. v. Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 1994No. 59790PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harper, Judge.
Aluminum Line Products Company (“Aluminum Line”) purchased a 1982 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur automobile (“the vehicle”) from Qua Buick, Inc. (“Qua Buick”) on November 16, 1982 for a purchase price of $95,318. The purchase price was remitted to Qua Buick at the time of delivery. Aluminum Line received a “Rolls-Royce Motors Limited Warranty” when it purchased the vehicle.
The vehicle suffered from a multitude of problems, both cosmetic and mechanical, leading to repeat service by Qua Buick. Kenneth Wessel, the president and principal shareholder of Aluminum Line, penned a letter to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Timothy Brainard v. American Skandia Life Assurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Toshiba MacHine Co. v. SPM Flow Control, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Galehouse Construction Company v. WinklerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Kuns v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Brainard v. American SkandiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.