Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 23, 1972No. 450, 453 and 454, Dockets 71-1808, 71-1814 and 71-1815PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARIE, District Judge:

All three appellants were convicted of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d), after a jury trial before Chief Judge Mishler, and each was sentenced on July 9, 1971 to twenty-five years imprisonment. Appellant Guglielmo seeks a reversal of his conviction on the ground that his obstreperous and bizarre behavior during trial imposed a constitutional duty upon the trial judge to initiate further inquiry into his competency to stand trial. Appellants Marshall and Solina claim that their convictions should be overturned, because the trial court refused to grant their repeated…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Jose Figueroa, Angel Lebron, and Ralph AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Joseph CalabroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API