People v. McIntire
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.
Appellate judges are occasionally faced with distasteful obligations. Chief among these is the duty to either overturn or mitigate a sentence on a so-called “technicality,” though the reason is mandated by law. Such a duty unfolds before us here in dealing with a defendant who, at time of one sentence, was addressed thus by the trial court:.“I will now sentence you on the charge of assault with intent to rape. ;
“I want to make a few comments on this case. I heard this case, and it was only by the grace of the Almighty that I am not permitted to eliminate you from society forever. You haven’t…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Foreman v. FayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- In re MouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- United States ex rel. Vines v. MurphyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1963
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. StrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Justice v. HedrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. YoungbloodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. BradleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.