Legal Opinion

People v. McIntire

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1967No. Docket 2,348PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.

Appellate judges are occasionally faced with distasteful obligations. Chief among these is the duty to either overturn or mitigate a sentence on a so-called “technicality,” though the reason is mandated by law. Such a duty unfolds before us here in dealing with a defendant who, at time of one sentence, was addressed thus by the trial court:.“I will now sentence you on the charge of assault with intent to rape. ;

“I want to make a few comments on this case. I heard this case, and it was only by the grace of the Almighty that I am not permitted to eliminate you from society forever. You haven’t…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Foreman v. FayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. In re MouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. United States ex rel. Vines v. MurphyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. StrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Justice v. HedrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. YoungbloodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. BradleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API