Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Department of Revenue v. Capital Shelters, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1983No. OTC 1697-S, SC 28783PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

This case presents an issue which has arisen frequently in recent years.1 The question is the scope of the Department of Revenue’s subpoena power under ORS 305.190(1). Appellant, Capital Shelters, Inc., contends that the Department’s subpoena power is limited by the term “necessary,” which appears in the statute twice, to instances of what amount to compelling need for information.

We hold that there is no such limitation on the scope of the Department’s subpoena power. The term “necessary,” as contained by the statute, means relevant to the purposes of a lawful investigation and the object of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Department of Revenue v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Eola Concrete Tile & Products Co. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. Universal Foods Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Friends of Yamhill County v. City of NewbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. FRIENDS OF YAMHILL CTY. v. City of NewbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. Amador-HernandezOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  5. State v. Amador-HernandezOregon Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API