Legal Opinion

In re Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1947No. 20716PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON. District Judge.

The present matter involves the claim of Samuel Marion, Allen H. Berkman and Nathan D. Leiman, attorneys for the Preferred Stockholders’ Protective Committee. Their claim is for “additional compensa*657tion” under the agreement in a letter signed by Alexander Guttmann, chairman of the committee, which declared that 584 shares of preferred stock were held in escrow for the claimants as additional compensation for their services.

On November 16, 1945, the court allowed the claimants $37,500.00 out of the debtor’s estate. Their claim for compensation was evidently misconstrued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Standard Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. Chris Schroeder & Son Co. v. Watco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. In Re McCrory Stores CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. Greensfelder v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  5. Zweifel, Tuohy & Crager v. Trans-State Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leiman v. GuttmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Leiman v. GuttmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Leiman v. GuttmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Leiman v. GuttmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API