Legal Opinion

Leiman v. Guttman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThacheb, J.

Upon appeal from an order of the Appellate Division which affirmed an order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action the following question was certified: “ Has the Supreme Court of the State of New York jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action to recover for legal services rendered to the stockholders committee which are not compensable out of the assets of the Debtor’s estate, in a Chapter X reorganization proceeding under the United States Bankruptcy Act? ”

The complaint alleges that plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Brown v. GerdesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. In re Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leiman v. GuttmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Sirgrom Properties, Inc. v. Air King Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API