Legal Opinion

Vinokur v. Sovereign Bank

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 22, 2010No. 07-CV-2893 (KAM) (MDG)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

MATSUMOTO, District Judge:

Presently before the court is defendant Sovereign Bank’s (“defendant” or “Sovereign”) motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, seeking dismissal of plaintiff Faina Vinokur’s (“plaintiff’ or “Vinokur”) action. In this action, plaintiff alleges employment discrimination in violation of New York State Executive Law (“NYSEL”) § 296 and New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), Administrative Code § 8-107. 1 Plaintiff alleges that defendant discriminated against her on the basis of disability (rheumatoid arthritis),…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BattagliaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
  2. Hernandez v. International Shoppes, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  3. Schlenger v. Fidelity Employer Services Co., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Miloscia v. B.R. Guest Holdings LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Kaplan v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API