Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Washburn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

This was a rule directed to tbe circuit judge of tbe tenth circuit, requiring him to appear and show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should- not be issued, commanding him to enter an order changing the place of trial' in an action therein mentioned. It appears from the papers upon which the rule was granted, that an action for the recovery of money was commenced against the relators in the circuit court of Oconto county. The relators are all residents of Milwaukee county, and service was had upon them in that county. Before the time for answering expired, the defendants demanded in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oatman v. BondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Western Bank of Scotland v. TallmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  3. State ex rel. Brownell v. McArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State ex rel. Spence v. DickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Couillard v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Winfrey v. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Levy v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API