State ex rel. Spence v. Dick
Wisconsin Supreme Court
JVíaNdamus to James J. DioK, Judge of the Circuit Court for Dodge county: to the point that the writ would not lie because the remedy by appeal from the final judgment was adequate, cited State ex rel. Johnson v. Wash-burn, 22 Wis. 99; People ex rel. MLeminger v. Sexton, 24 Cal. 78 •, St. Glair T. Go. v. St. Glair Circuit Judge, 114 Mich. 417; Mich. ML. F. Ins. Go. v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 112 Mich. 270.
1Opinion of the CourtWiNslow, J.
This is a mandamus action commenced in this court, the object being to compel the respondent, as circuit judge of the Thirteenth circuit, to make an order changing the venue of the action of Laura W. Spence against William Pieper and others to some circuit court outside of said Thirteenth circuit. An alternative writ was issued, and return thereto made by the respondent, and the relator demurred to the sufficiency of the return. It appears by the return that the action of Spence v. Pieper et al. was a foreclosure action pending in the circuit court for Dodge county,, and that the relator…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neu v. VoegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Brownell v. McArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Northwestern Iron Co. v. CraneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Evans v. CurtissWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Johnson v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by14 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Department of Natural Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IVWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Hustisford Light, Power & Manufacturing Co. v. GrimmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- State ex rel. McGovern v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.