Legal Opinion

Connor v. Robinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1926No. 19524. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff Connor, as receiver for the insolvent H. I. S. Motor Corporation, seeks recovery from the defendants • Robinson, Williams, Te-walt, Carithers and McCabe, upon alleged unpaid subscriptions for capital stock of the corporation owned by them respectively, to the end that the creditors of the corporation be paid. A trial upon the merits in the superior court for Spokane county, sitting without a jury, resulted in judgment awarding to the plaintiff recovery against the defendants Robinson, Williams, Tewalt and Carithers respectively, from which they have each appealed to this court,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Davies v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Shuey v. AdairWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Inland Nursery & Floral Co. v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Shuey v. HolmesWashington Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seguin v. PlanoWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. SatterwhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Johnsen v. Pheasant Pickling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API