Legal Opinion

Civil Serv. Com'n v. District Ct. in & for Cty. of Adams

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 3, 1974No. 26368PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

This is an original proceeding by petitioner Civil Service Commission of Aurora for a writ of prohibition directing the respondent district court to dismiss a complaint filed under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) for the failure to timely join indispensable parties. We issued a rule to show cause why such relief should not be granted, and the respective parties have briefed the issue before the court. We make the rule absolute.

I

Respondent Robert E. O’Harrow is a police officer of the Aurora, Colorado, police department. He, together with four other eligible officers, were examined for promotion to Police…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hidden Lake Development Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. Woodco v. LindahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Hennigh v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  4. Western Pav. Const. Co. v. District Ct., Jefferson Cty.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brody v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Norby v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Civil Serv. Com'n of C. & C. of Denver v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  4. Aztec Minerals Corp. v. RomerColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Newman v. McKinley Oil Field ServiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API