Civil Serv. Com'n v. District Ct. in & for Cty. of Adams
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This is an original proceeding by petitioner Civil Service Commission of Aurora for a writ of prohibition directing the respondent district court to dismiss a complaint filed under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) for the failure to timely join indispensable parties. We issued a rule to show cause why such relief should not be granted, and the respective parties have briefed the issue before the court. We make the rule absolute.
I
Respondent Robert E. O’Harrow is a police officer of the Aurora, Colorado, police department. He, together with four other eligible officers, were examined for promotion to Police…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hidden Lake Development Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Woodco v. LindahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Hennigh v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Western Pav. Const. Co. v. District Ct., Jefferson Cty.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brody v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Norby v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Civil Serv. Com'n of C. & C. of Denver v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Aztec Minerals Corp. v. RomerColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Newman v. McKinley Oil Field ServiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.