Little v. Oklahoma Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 3. Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; James I. Phelps, Judge. > Action by William Little against Oklahoma Railroad Company, a eorporatioh. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
JPlaintiff in error, as plaintiff, on April 111-, 1921, commenced this action against the Oklahoma Railway Company, a corporation, and Anton H. Classen, as defendants, to recover the value of the 36%, acres of land situated in S.E.VÍ of S.W.14 of section 32, township 11 north, range 3 west, Oklahoma county. Upon demurrer the cause was- dismissed against Classen.
The facts as shown by the pleadings and the evidence are substantially as follows;
In 1909 and prior thereto the defendant owned a street car system in Oklahoma City* and had extended it south of the city, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Parkersburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926