Legal Opinion

St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. Barr

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1934No. 2943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.. Appellee Barr was a member of appellant’s switching crew working in the Sherman yards. While so engaged, he had the ends of three fingers pinched off and this suit is to recover damages therefor.

A coal gondola car was kicked to connect with a string of other cars. Barr boarded the car to slacken its speed before its impact with the cars to which it was intended to be connected.. He undertook to apply the brake at the end of the ear. The brake for some reason did not function and it was necessary for Barr to quickly descend from the car to protect himself from the impending…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Robertson & Mueller v. HoldenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SomersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Greer v. ThamanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Casstevens v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Poindexter v. Receivers of the Kirby Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. MoserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Cockburn v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Wells v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Cockburn v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API