Legal Opinion

Donelson v. Goff

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 26, 1926Published

1Opinion of the Court

DeWITT, X

In this cause defendants, A. E. Haston, E. E. Goff and A. J. Donelson, obtained a writ of error to review so much of a decree as awards a recovery against them of $1,743.73 upon a promissory note signed by them and also by C. Y. Goff, J. D. Donelson, W. W. Davis, and W. H. Wilson. The decree awards recovery against all .of them, but these four last-named parties made no resistance and pro confesso was taken as to them.

These appellants answered averring that by reason' of certain material alterations made in said note without their knowledge or consent they were released from all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bethune v. DozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. Diamond Distilleries Co. v. GottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Hall's Adm'x v. McHenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. McDaniel v. WhitsettTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Citizens Savings Bank of Columbus v. HalsteadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API