Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Whitsett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM MARSHALL. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Marshall County. W. C. HoustoN, J.

1Opinion of the Court

"Wilkes, J.

This is an action to recover upon a note for $200, given in part consideration of a tract of land. It was commenced before a Justice of the Peace, appealed to the Circuit Court, and there tried before the Judge without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff has appealed and assigned errors. The defendant filed a special plea of non est factum, averring that the note had been fraudulently altered by the payee after it was given. The note, as originally given, was payable to the order of James C. Whitsett, and specified on its face that it was for…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PaxtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Gray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Deering Harvester Co. v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. LaGrange v. CoyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API