Legal Opinion

Murray v. Buckner

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided December 15, 1913Published

1Opinion of the CourtSutphin, J.

This is an action for damages to real property and for loss of nse of property. Plaintiff is the owner of a lot and brick building at No. 534 Clinton street, Cincinnati, and the defendant is the owner of property immediately adjoining on the west upon which is a brick building and in the rear of which is a closet built over a vault in close proximity to the dividing line between the two properties. The petition charged that the closet and vault were used by tenants who occupied the defendant’s building, and that for a period of four years past de*425iend'ant maintained this vault in such a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Davis v. . Niagara Falls Tower Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Finkelstein v. HunerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Iliff v. School DirectorsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API