Legal Opinion

Farguet v. Desenti

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The plaintiff brings this action against the owners of a tenement house to recover for injuries suffered by reason of the breaking of a rail of a veranda at the rear of the house. There were three tenements in the house, each occupying one floor. There was a porch running across the rear of the house on each floor and stairways led from that one on the first floor to that on the second floor and from that on the second floor to that on the third. Access was gained to the porch on the first floor by steps leading up to it from the rear yard. These steps were located on the side of the porch…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  2. State v. GannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  3. Vinci v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. State v. MarxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  5. Phelan v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. LoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Martel v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Brandt v. RakauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Butler v. ManeySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Shegda v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API