Legal Opinion

Gschwend v. Stoll

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1951No. Civ. 7961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Plaintiffs and respondents brought this action against defendants and appellants to recover the sum of $1,308.81. The complaint contained two common counts: (1) 11 That within two years last past defendants became indebted to plaintiffs in the agreed sum of $7,258.05 for lumber, logs and lumbering materials sold and delivered,” and “that only $5,949.24 has been paid”; and (2) “That within two years last past the defendants became indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $7,258.05 for lumber, logs, and lumbering materials sold and delivered,” and “that only $5,949.24 has been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reiniger v. HassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Nicolds v. StorchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Pellegrino v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Hitchcock v. LovelaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Publishers Distributing Service, Inc. v. Southern California School Book Depository, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Broadway Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Fowler v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Gross v. NeedhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Fischer v. OstbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Thornton v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API