United States v. Underwood
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA H. BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
Lee E. Underwood appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, in which he claimed a due-process violation because a magistrate, not district, judge presided over his plea hearing without express consent. Pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), the district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on whether Underwood procedurally defaulted by failing to raise his due-process claim on direct appeal. We do not reach procedural default, basing our decision instead on the subsumed issue of implied consent.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. David ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Adam ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Charles Stringer v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Bobby CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.