Legal Opinion

United States v. Underwood

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 18, 2010No. 08-31243PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA H. BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

Lee E. Underwood appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, in which he claimed a due-process violation because a magistrate, not district, judge presided over his plea hearing without express consent. Pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), the district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on whether Underwood procedurally defaulted by failing to raise his due-process claim on direct appeal. We do not reach procedural default, basing our decision instead on the subsumed issue of implied consent.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. United States v. David ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Adam ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Charles Stringer v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Bobby CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API