Legal Opinion

Hroch v. Aultman & Taylor Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Charles Mix county. Hon. E. G-. .Smith, Judge. Action by James Hroch against the Aultman & Taylor Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and his attorneys filed .a lien for their services. On motion, plaintiff’s judgment, less the amount of the attorneys’ lien, was set off against a judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff and Richard Perkins, .and defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal from circuit court, Charles Mix county. Hon. E. G-. .Smith, Judge. Action by James Hroch against the Aultman & Taylor Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and his attorneys filed .a lien for their services. On motion, plaintiff’s judgment, less the amount of the attorneys’ lien, was set off against a judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff and Richard Perkins, .and defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. An attorney’s lien can only be for a reasonable fee as against the judgment debtor seeking the set-off. Rice v. Day, 49 N. W. 1128. The claim…

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal by the Aultman & Taylor Company from an order of the circuit court, made on the application of said company, to set off mutual judgments. The court below refused to make such set-off to the full amount of the judgment obtained by Hroch against that company, but deducted therefrom the sum of $842.96, on which Messrs. Hoppaugh & Ellis, attorneys for Hroch, claimed a lien for professional services in obtaining said judgment. The facts, as presented by the record, briefly stated, are as follows: On September 3, 1890, the Aultman & Taylor Company recovered a judgment against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nicoll v. NicollCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Kent v. Dakota Fire & Marine InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Cole v. Custer County Agricultural, Mineral & Stock Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ClarksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Dankwardt v. KermodeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Clark v. SullivanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Schuler v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Jacobsen v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API