Lane v. Owings
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION of the Court, by
Ch. J. Boyle.
Harrison and Owings executed a joint obligation, binding themselves to deliver to Lane and Taylor a quantity of hemp, on or before a day therein named ; and at the time of executing the obligation there was an endorsement made on it to this effect, viz. “ it is understood that Owings is only the security of the within note, in case of the failure of Harrison.”
For a failure to deliver the hemp, an action of covenant was brought on the obligation against Harrison and Owings ; to which Owings separately pleaded, in substance, that by the endorsement aforesaid…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Guard v. WhitesideIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- Reed v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1823
- United States v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1883
- Rorerts v. Strang, Adriance & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1863
- Perkins v. GilmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1829
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.