Legal Opinion

Dondelinger v. Dondelinger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1917No. 21,113PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Kingman district court; George L. Hay, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one for a divorce on the ground of abandonment. The answer prayed for a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty, and for cancellation of a contract relating to property rights. Relief was denied both parties, and both appeal.

On the plaintiff’s side it is said that he was denied a divorce because he did not seek the defendant’s return after her final departure. There were no special findings, and there was some evidence that the plaintiff was as much responsible for his wife’s leaving as she was.

On the defendant’s side it is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Petty v. PettySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. DondelingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API