Legal Opinion

Ittel v. Pietig

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 2005No. A05-222PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Homeowners Terry and Gina Ittel appeal from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing their claims for defective construction against a vendor-contractor and its subcontractors. The Ittels acknowledge that a previous settlement agreement’s general-release provisions bar the breach-of-contract and consumer-fraud claims, and we affirm the dismissal of those claims. But, because the settlement agreement is subject to the statutory new-home warranties in Minn.Stat. § 327A.04 (2004), and the release does not effectively waive or modify the warranties, we reverse and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Wegener v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of M.R.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Cardio Flow, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API