State v. Geeslin
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a defendant’s due process rights are violated when evidence in the hands of the state is lost or destroyed. For the reasons that follow, we hold that unless a defendant can show that the state acted in bad faith, the state’s failure to preserve potentially useful evidence does not violate a defendant’s due process rights.
Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} Appellant James Geeslin’s vehicle was stopped by Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper Tim Wenger in the early morning hours of August 16, 2004. At a hearing in the trial court on a motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BlantonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. EvickOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. NicholsonOhio Supreme Court · 2024
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.