Legal Opinion

State v. Geeslin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 2007No. 2006-0882PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a defendant’s due process rights are violated when evidence in the hands of the state is lost or destroyed. For the reasons that follow, we hold that unless a defendant can show that the state acted in bad faith, the state’s failure to preserve potentially useful evidence does not violate a defendant’s due process rights.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} Appellant James Geeslin’s vehicle was stopped by Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper Tim Wenger in the early morning hours of August 16, 2004. At a hearing in the trial court on a motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. BlantonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. EvickOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. NicholsonOhio Supreme Court · 2024

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API