Legal Opinion

State v. Woodfield

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 2, 1983No. 125510 to 125513 CA A22732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Defendant appeals from his convictions for murder, attempted murder and two counts of first degree sodomy. We affirm.

Defendant was accused as being the “1-5 Bandit,” an individual responsible for several serious crimes along that interstate highway. We repeat the facts only as they are necessary to explain the assignments of error. Defendant first contends that the court erred in denying his motion to call Lawrence Moore as a witness. Moore had been convicted of murders in the Oregon Museum Tavern' in Salem. The purpose of calling him was to have two paramedics who were called to the scene in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BrockOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. CaliaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. GwytherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. HoltermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. DerrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API