Legal Opinion

Moultis v. Degen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 24, 1983No. 21770PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This appeal presents the question whether Section 21-15-640, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), erects a time bar to a tort claim not filed with an estate within five months after first publication of notice to creditors. The trial judge held the statute barred the claim in suit and sustained a demurrer on that ground.

The pertinent portions of § 21-15-640 provide:

All claims of creditors of such estate shall upon the expiration of five months after the first publication of the notice prescribed in § 21-15-630 be forever barred unless, before the expiration of such period,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Doremus Ex Rel. Rentz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Belancsik v. Overlake Memorial HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hinz v. Curzenski EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In Re the Estate of MilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Williams v. GrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ivory v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Estate of Carr Ex Rel. Bolton v. Circle S Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Products Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Winyah Nursing Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API