Rosado v. Alameida
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 165.]
JONES, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) as to all claims in Plaintiff Olga Rosado’s (“Plaintiff’) Complaint. [Doc. No. 165.] Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (“Opposition”), and Defendants filed a Reply to the Opposition (“Reply”). [Doc. Nos. 175, 181.] Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court decides the matter on the pleadings submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. Civ. Rule 7.1(d)(1). For…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dean v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- (PC) Cooper v. The AIS Center and Out Patient SurgeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Hernandez v. AranasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Joseph v. ClaytonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020