Legal Opinion

Rosado v. Alameida

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 14, 2007No. CIV.03CV1110J(LSP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 165.]

JONES, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) as to all claims in Plaintiff Olga Rosado’s (“Plaintiff’) Complaint. [Doc. No. 165.] Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (“Opposition”), and Defendants filed a Reply to the Opposition (“Reply”). [Doc. Nos. 175, 181.] Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court decides the matter on the pleadings submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. Civ. Rule 7.1(d)(1). For…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dean v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  2. (PC) Cooper v. The AIS Center and Out Patient SurgeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. Hernandez v. AranasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  4. Joseph v. ClaytonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API