Legal Opinion

James T. Hair Co. v. Huckins

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1893No. 209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. In Equity. This was a suit by the James T. Hair Company against Joseph Huckins to restrain the alleged violation of a contract. The court below sustained a demurrer to the bill, and complainant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. In Equity. This was a suit by the James T. Hair Company against Joseph Huckins to restrain the alleged violation of a contract. The court below sustained a demurrer to the bill, and complainant appeals. Statement by CALDWELL, Circuit Judge: The appellant, the Jamos T. Hair Company, and the appellee, Joseph Huck-ins, entered into a contract, of which the following is a copy: “Texarkana, May 11th, 1S88. “To whom it may concern: In consideration of the reduced rates (as given elsewhere on this leaf) at which…

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, Circuit Judge

According to the record, the court below rested its judgment sustaining the demurrer to The bill upon the ground “that the contract sued on is in restraint of trade, against public policy, and void,” and the briefs of counsel are directed chiellv to a discussion of that aspect of tin case; but we do not And it necessary to consider the question whether the contract was one in restraint of trade, and void for that reason. One of the grounds of demurrer to the bill is that the plaintiff has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. That this ground of demurrer was well taken is so plaiu and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bartholomae & Roesing Brewing & Malting Co. v. ModzelewskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. General Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1907
  3. Hardy v. Allegan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Johnson v. Bruckhart, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1934
  5. Murphy v. WeillDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API