Legal Opinion
United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 27, 2012No. 19-1112PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Chief Judge:
Appellant tobacco companies seek review of a district court order clarifying an injunction requiring appellants to disclose marketing data to the government. Appellants claim that the clarification of the injunction actually effects a modification of the requirements. Our jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal is dependent on the district court having modified the injunction. Because we conclude that it did not, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
I
In 1999, the United States brought a civil action…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tronox Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Mohammadi v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Slate v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Reliable Limousine Service, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.