Legal Opinion

Mensinger v. Hass

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 11, 1949No. 47331PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

— The-question presented is whether decedent’s widow may retain the homestead for life in lieu of her distributive share in decedent’s real estate. See section 561.12, Code, 1946 (10146, Code, 1939).

Frank Mensinger died intestate May 1, 1936, the owner of a homestead in Clinton here in controversy and a one-fifth interest in real estate- in Camanche. He left a widow, Wilhelamena, a son, Maynard, two daughters, Julia and Fernanna, and an infant son, Gerald, who died about eight months later. Maynard brought this partition action in September 1947 against his mother and the two minor daughters…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Reichard v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Coomes v. FineganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. Owens v. AndrewsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Stoddard v. KendallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robbins v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Nichols v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Abel v. AbelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. In Re Estate of DluhosSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  5. Matter of Estate of KeeganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API