Legal Opinion
Steffen v. Vader Mountain Capital
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 14, 2022No. 3:22-cv-03001Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION MARK DAVID STEFFEN, 3:22-CV-03001-RAL Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Vs. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING VADER MOUNTAIN CAPITAL, STEPHANIE BAEZ, Defendants. This action arises from a business financing arrangement in which the pro se plaintiff, Mark David Steffen, sold and assigned to Vader Mountain Capital, aka Vader Servicing, LLC (collectively “Vader”), a portion of the future receipts of his sole proprietorship, which does business under the name “SCS Protective.” Doc. 5 at 1. Steffen…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.