Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hyle

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

' Action to compel the specific performance of a lease. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Sawyer', .J.

This action is based upon a contract under seal, dated July 9, 1904, which recites that it is between' Sarah A. Fox, her heirs and administrators by Joseph G. Sherman of the first part, and George A. Hall (.this plaintiff) of the second part, and is signed by Joseph G. Sherman in his individual name and George A. Hall, respectively.

It purports to lease certain premises in the city of *73Rochester, and also includes an option for their purchase by Mr. Hall upon certain terms and conditions within a time “ which shall not exceed three years from the date of this lease.”

It appears that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. Levin v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Pomeroy v. NewellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Larkin v. RadostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Satterly v. DewickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall v. HyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API