Legal Opinion

Lietzman v. Ruidoso State Bank

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1992No. 19571PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Chief Justice.

This suit arises out of failed efforts by Carolyn Lietzman to prevent the withdrawal of funds from an account at the Ruidoso State Bank after the death of her husband, Robert Lietzman. Carolyn Lietzman claimed that funds in the O-Bar-O Property Development account belonged to her and her husband even though neither of their names appeared on the account signature card maintained by the Bank. The only signatory was Fred Heckman, who was able to transfer the funds to another account despite Carolyn Lietzman’s efforts. Heckman was a business associate of Robert…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Kestenbaum v. Pennzoil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Schoenfelder v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Gerety v. DemersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hinger v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Beavers v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API