Corbitt v. Cutcheon
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Section 6203 of HowelFs Statutes enacts that—
“Every conveyance or assignment, in writing or otherwise, of any estate or interest in lands, or in goods, -or things in action * * * made with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors * * * of their lawful suits, damages, forfeitures, debts, or demands, * * * shall be void.”
The intent of the parties, and the effect of the con*43veyance upon the creditors of the grantor, form the criterion to determine whether such conveyance is fraudulent. Pierce v. Hill, 35 Mich. 199. If the conveyance is made with intent to hinder or delay or defraud…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cleland v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
- Allen v. KinyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Knauth v. BassettNew York Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hollister v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Cook v. BallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- McBryan v. TrowbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Cutcheon v. BuchananMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Cook v. BallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944