Legal Opinion

Nugent v. Lindsley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 6, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill is for partition or sale of land lying in the great meadows at Newark, which in 1836 belonged to Demas Colton, Jr., and Stephen B. Alling, and the title has since passed to their respective descendants. Jane L. Alling Parkhurst, one of the daughters of Stephen B. Alling, took by devise under her father's will and conveyed her share to the complainant July 29th, 1925. The defendants are the remaining descendants, and Stuart Lindsley, the holder of a tax title in fee under the Martin act, by deed from the comptroller of Newark to Florence E. Cahill, December 29th, 1907, and by her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Welles v. SchafferNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  2. Nugent v. HayesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  3. Milmore v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  4. Milmoe v. ZimmermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Wittes v. RepkoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  3. Johnson v. ArbabiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Elizabeth Heights Realty Co. v. SchafferNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  5. Mitchell v. GaedeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API