Nugent v. Hayes
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion to strike out the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Backes, V. C.
This bill is for the partition of waste lands in the great meadows at Newark. The fee was in Samuel Whittaker in 1818. The complainant acquired and owns one hundred and sixty-five two hundred tenths undivided parts. The defendants, other than Stewart Lindsley and John Erancis Cahill and wife, own the rest. Stewart Lindsley claims title to the tract under a tax deed executed by the comptroller of Newark to Mrs. Cahill (Lindsley’s grantor) by virtue of the Martin act. Comp. Stat. p. 5205. The property was sold for taxes in 1906. The comptroller conveyed to Cahill in 1909 upon an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clift v. FrencheNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
- De Raismes v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Newark v. CookNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Welles v. SchafferNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Chase Brass, C., Co. v. Bart Reflector Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Gonzales v. Harrington Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
- Nugent v. LindsleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.